Na Tasya Pratima Asti | न तस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति

Na Tasya Pratima Asti | न तस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति

Response to Dr Zakir Naik by Sant Rampal Ji on Yajur Ved 32.3 - न तस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति - Na Tasya Pratima Asti.

Zakir Naik uses this verse from Yajur Ved 32.3 to stake a claim that the Vedas also say that the God is formless. Sant Rampal Ji refutes this claim of Zakir Naik and proves that God is in form. Vedas clearly say that God is in form.


FAQs about "Na Tasya Pratima Asti | न तस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति"

Q.1 How does Dr. Zakir Naik interpret the verse "न तस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति" (Na Tasya Pratima Asti) from Yajur Ved 32.3?

Dr. Zakir Naik interprets this verse to support the idea that God is formless. He argues that the absence of an idol or image is an indication of God's formlessness.

Q.2 How does Sant Rampal Ji respond to Dr. Zakir Naik's interpretation of the verse?

Sant Rampal Ji refutes Dr. Zakir Naik's claim by presenting evidence from the same Vedas. The context of the verse, along with other passages from the Vedas, supports the notion that God indeed has a divine form.

Q.3 What evidence does Sant Rampal Ji provide to assert that God is in form according to the Vedas?

Sant Rampal Ji cites additional verses and context from the Vedas to demonstrate that the overall message is that God does have a divine form. He point to specific hymns or passages that describe God in a personal, anthropomorphic manner.

Q.4 Are there other interpretations of "न तस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति" (Na Tasya Pratima Asti) within Vedic literature?

Yes, there are diverse interpretations of Vedic verses, and scholars have different perspectives on the meaning of specific passages. But enlightened saint can only provide the true meaning of these verses.

Q.5 How does Sant Rampal Ji Maharaj emphasize the importance of understanding the context of Vedic verses?

Sant Rampal Ji Maharaj stresses the significance of considering the broader context of Vedic verses and not isolating specific lines. Holistic understanding of the Vedic literature is crucial to grasp the intended meaning of passages related to the nature of God.


Recent Comments

Latest Comments by users
If you have any query regarding the above content, please email us at [email protected], we will try to solve it with proof.
Akhilesh Kumar

I'm perplexed about the concept of God being formless. We often hear that God is formless, but then we see representations like Vishnu ji with a distinct form. How can God be formless if we have visible depictions?

Satlok Ashram

Dear reader, we appreciate your engagement with our article. Our information is rooted in scriptures and evidence, challenging mere folklore. While Vishnu ji is a powerful figure, he is not the almighty God. The supreme deity, as per various holy scriptures, is in human like form who created the entire universe and sat on the throne like a King. For a deeper understanding, we recommend reading the book Gyan Ganga and exploring the spiritual discourses of Saint Rampal Ji Maharaj.

Altamash Ansari

Dr. Zakir Naik is correct; Allah is considered formless in our community. While I may not be well-versed in Hindu beliefs, in Islam, we emphasize the formlessness of Allah.

Satlok Ashram

Dear reader, we respect your perspective on our article. The concept of a formless God is universal, and all religions are guided by the same supreme being, who manifests in human form, as supported by various scriptures. It's essential to explore spiritual knowledge to understand that Allah, too, has forms, as indicated in Islamic holy texts. For more insights, we recommend reading the book Gyan Ganga and listening to the spiritual discourses of Saint Rampal Ji Maharaj.